I’m sure there is no need to remind anyone that on September 11, 2001, four planes were hijacked with the express intent of striking in the United States. Two were arguably extremely successful, causing the ultimate collapse of the World Trade Center, thousands of deaths, and the unprecedented closure of the financial markets in the United States. One other struck the Pentagon and the final plane was crashed either directly by the passengers or as recently released transcripts seem to indicate, by the hijackers because they couldn’t fight off all the plane’s passengers. Whether this can be considered an act of war or not is debatable. After all the acts have been traced back to Osama Bin Laden and Al Quaeda, these are not leaders of countries or any government.
Sadly, although the United States has pursued Osama and his henchmen, creating a new, different and, by most standards, better government in Afghanistan, we have strayed extremely far off course.
First and foremost we have not captured nor slain Osama Bin Laden (August 23, 2004). There are those who float the cynical theory that we have already captured him and he is being secretly held until a politically advantageous time for the Bush reelection effort. Whether this is true or not remains to be seen.
Second, Bush has managed to turn this into a war against Saddam Hussein. Saddam has thumbed his nose at the world, murdered (allegedly) thousands of his own countrymen using banned weapons, and hauled citizens out of their homes in the middle of the night to never be seen again. Elections were a joke: everyone turned out under fear of death and Saddam always received 100% of the vote. Saddam Hussein needed to be removed from power, now free Iraqi’s- at least some of them- will tell you life is better for them.
So what’s the problem?
George W. Bush sent Colin Powell to the United Nations to argue the case for war. The reason? Weapons of Mass Destruction. Scary things like anthrax, nerve gas, and even nuclear weapons. Materials being purchased in Africa that are only used for refining plutonium into weapons grade nuclear material, photos of air fields and missiles that could or would be used to launch weapons at other countries in the middle east. Never mind that Iraq was publicly declaring they had no WMDs, had submitted hundreds or thousands of documents refuting the existance of WMDs, we have to date (August 23, 2004) not found any WMDs, our intelligence was flawed at best, or at worst made up to satisfy Dick Cheney’s requests of the CIA, North Korea was flexing its muscles by declaring they had nuclear weapons capable of hitting the United States, and Libya was much more advanced in their weapons programs than anyone knew.
Libya did agree to dismantle all of their weapons programs [CNN.com] with many perceiving this to be a result of the war in Iraq. True or not, this is generally viewed as a move in the right direction and the United Nations has lifted sanctions against Libya.
The citizens of the United States, and the world were lied to. Whether Saddam is so clever that he hid his weapons where we can’t find them, destroyed them just before the US invaded, or didn’t have what we were told that he had is irrelevant. We invaded a sovereign country under the guise of our “War on Terror”. It is not part of the “War on Terror” no matter how many times Fox News uses the logo when talking about Iraq. The war in Iraq detracts from our hunt for Osama, alienates us to many, many countries around the world and diverts much needed resources from the US so that companies such as Dick Cheney’s ‘former’ company Haliburton can ‘earn’ illegally high margins on products and services.
Bush says that even knowing what he knows today, he would still invade Iraq because the world is now a ’safer place’. My theory is that he knew all along what we know today. There are no WMDs in Iraq. The world is not a safer place today. It is more dangerous. The borders of Iraq are wide open and our ‘enemies’ are pouring in. Bill Maher made a fantastic observation on Larry King on July 22, 2004,
“…Saddam Hussein would never have allowed a terrorist base in his country, because they were a power rival to him. Dictators never allow a power rival in their country. There was no terrorism in Iraq before this war. Now there is.” [CNN.com]
It’s time we refocused on the real “War on Terror” and resumed our search for Osama.